Monday, 12 January 2015

Wet Wet Wet - that's a pop group, isn't it? No it's not, it was what the CRC2 gang got today! The forecast was dire, but in fact we didn't do too badly, with steady drizzle for most of the morning, and more persistent rain only after lunch. 9 men attended.

So what did we do?
To start with, an opening shot from the other end. John O asked me to do this, so that people could see what we have done, and how far the coal face is now, from the point from which we started.
Can you see the little matchstick men in the distance?

We also had to dispose of a pile of surplus ballast on the Race Course side of the fence, in readiness for work to be done on the LC approach road.
Now that the heavy lorry traffic here has finished, the road and verges can be repaired.

Then the opening shot for the day. Because of the forecast of steady rain, we couldn't lay any blues, so John S and Tony concentrated on laying the blocks for the 170m section. Here you can see them, starting from opposite ends. Apparently, they would stop when their bottoms met in the middle... Derrick has brought down two barrows of muck, one for each.

That mortar...
I apologise for the lack of focus of this action picture... but John O had just filled the barrow nearest to the camera, when I pointed out, advice freely given, that it had a puncture. This is not what John wanted to hear! After much muttering, the second barrow in the picture received all the mortar poured into the first. The laying of blocks always requires a lot of brown.

Only a good hour or so later, John S and Tony had done it. Brilliant! The whole section now has its row of concrete blocks, and here you can see them start to fill them in with liquid mush, a job completed by lunch time.
We've had a request from the Race Course to shift our stock of back fill, piled high behind the signal box in their field. This means we have to start back filling, rather earlier than otherwise intended. To do this, we need to lay some drains, at least part way, so instead of laying facing bricks, JC and Bob put in about 30yds of pipe and boxed it in. This meant we had to start the 'Pea Gravel Train' again, and yours truly and Brian ran it up and down so that it could be bucketed into the boxed in section.

Here we can see the section already done, and Brian handing JC another bucketful. Meanwhile, Pete and Derrick were up on the old platform clearing it of rubble, which was thrown into the gap behind the wall. The site looks rather tidier now, leaving only the old platform slabs still to be removed or reutilised. The idea is to get the 1T dumpers back in with a mini digger, and back fill this area, possibly as early as next Monday.

Notwithstanding this non-brick laying day, Fairview came with a vast quantity of building supplies, which were unloaded in the drizzle and wind. Cold and wet for those standing on top of the lorry! We took a fresh supply of concrete blocks (trolleyed down to the 180m section, ready for use), two pallets of corbelling blues, two dumpy bags of ballast for concrete, and a pallet of cement. That will keep us quiet for a moment.







 Lunch time, and, oh joy, a kind spouse has passed on a large box of delicious Ferrero Rochers.

What to do with them?

The last job of the day was to move half a pallet of corbelling bricks away from their previous resting place next to the signal box, and lay them out in ready piles next to the section to be corbelled next.
This involved a chain of volunteers, moving the bricks from the pallet and on to the Pway trolley. Some say the job would have been done quicker if one volunteer hadn't kept stopping to take pictures ! Sorry, chaps.

But no pictures, no blog, so what do you want. Here are the piles ready for use, the next time we get a dry (-ish) day.

Now, the interesting subject of mice in our cabin.

Those of a delicate disposition, look away now....
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

You looked, didn't you !

Yes, the trusty Little Nipper has caught two of them this time. High five! Peanut butter was the magic bait, works every time.
Bob has now brought a more modern rat trap (and I thought you couldn't invent a better mouse trap!) and we have set this too. Now awaiting developments with great interest. We will keep you informed. And the loose bars of soap (eaten up by said mice) have been replaced by liquid soap from a dispenser. Clever stuff.

9 comments:

Perry said...

The photos remind me of Manila's trolleys.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yw8QK2w2EH0

The 2874 Trsut said...

Great works lads certainly you now almost have good platform ow work with. re rodents if the budget will run to it how about investing in a sonic mouse/rat deterrent which should keep them out even when the door is open

Anonymous said...

Those look like juvenile rats to me.

Julian

Anonymous said...

Looking at picture 1, the platform stops quite abruptly, are you going to add a ramp or square it of at the southern end?

Jo said...

In reply to 'Anonymous':

The platform brickwork will be squared off with a set of concrete steps as it will only be used by GWR staff on occasions and not by the public.

Anonymous said...

Oh Jo, why are you going for the modern EU style platform ends- is this law now, even on heritage lines?

Anonymous said...

It's quite something when you consider how little platform wall there is left to build now, compared to what you were faced with at the start of construction. A great achievement that you should all be very pleased with. As an aside, surely there is room for a traditional ramp at the southern end of the platform? I think It would be a great shame to put steps instead of what is historically accurate.

Alex said...

Wouldn't have thought so, Broadway has ramps doesn't it? I seem to remember it is something to do with a corsican pine being in the way that can't be chopped down...

Michael Johnson said...

We have covered the issue of the modern 'Network Rail' style flat end of CRC platform 2 before (scroll back far enough and you'll find the discussion.) In a nutshell, nobody seems to know why the platform was designed like that. Every time the question is asked, different answers are given.

A long while back I asked Malcolm Temple, then the PLC chairman, about the platform on the Boardroom Blog. He gave me two slightly contradictory answers. First, he said that a ramped end would have 'no practical purpose' - which I thought was a very flimsy reply.

You could argue than many things the GWR does have 'no practical purpose', but as a heritage railway we go out of our way to create a 'period' appearance, even if this means we do more than just the basic practical minimum. If practicality is the be-all and end-all, we might as well scrap plans to rebuild Broadway station in the original style, and just put up a couple of bus shelters!

When I challenged Malcolm Temple on this point, he gave me a different answer: that there was no room to build a ramped end, because one of the trees was in the way.

I initially accepted this, but after visiting CRC myself and looking at the space available, I'm not at all sure that it's true. It's not like I've gone over the site with a tape measure, but it looks like there's plenty of room for a ramp - especially as it wouldn't necessarily have to be full platform width.

Later, when the subject was initially raised on this blog, yet another reason was given: that the platform might be extended one day, so a flat end was built to make the job easier.

But surely it would be simple enough to to build on from a ramped end. You can see platforms that have been extended in this way all over the rail network. Obviously it would mean dismantling the ramp, removing the edging slabs, etc, but we're only talking about a few yards of brickwork here. Not a difficult task for the railway that rebuilds entire embankments! Why is a platform ramp regarded as such a huge obstacle?

Still, the notion that the platform might be extended proves one thing - Malcolm Temple's 'tree in the way' obviously wasn't a problem after all.

Now we have - if I've counted correctly - reason number four for the flat end. Now, it's because only railway staff will be walking off the end of the platform.

Well, that equally applies at Winchcombe and Toddington. The platform ends away from the barrow crossings are out of bounds to the public, and only used by staff. Does that mean Winchcombe and Toddington will have their platform ends flattened, too? Will the platforms at Broadway have flat ends? Or does the 'staff only' argument only apply at CRC - and if so, why?

By the way, the fact that Network Rail has standardised on flat-ended platforms has nothing to do with the EU. It seems it's essentially for two reasons: first, because a flat-ended platform maximises the amount of useable length - an important factor on lines around London, which are now being extended to 10 and 12 car length, often on sites with restricted space. Platforms don't *have* to be flat-ended. Ramps are still built if necessary. You can see this at Vauxhall, where the platforms have been extended with flat ends - except for (I think) platforms 7 and 8, which have ramped ends.

Flat ends are also intended to make it difficult for potential suicides to gain access to the track. Unfortunately, suicides are rising on the railway. It seems that by making it awkward to get down to track level people often think twice about taking the final step - or, at any rate, it delays them long enough for help to arrive.

This is also the reason why signs advertising the Samaritans are now routinely put up at platform ends, and why island platforms now have the 'fast' side (which suicides tend to choose over the 'slow' side) fenced off, with access only though gates. You can see this on suburban stations into Paddington.